Sermon for Lent III
St Barnabas', Havana--Psalm 19:7-14, Exodus 20:1-17
After the Vietnam War was over, and the U.S. military stopped inducting draftees, the Selective Service System nevertheless remained in business, and the requirement that young men register for the draft when they turn 18 was never repealed. Apparently, however, there was a popular misimpression to the contrary, and the government bureaucrats in charge of such things were alarmed at the level of noncompliance. So they resorted to desperate measures, and retained the services of an advertising agency. The resulting campaign was run for several years—on television, on radio, and in print. There were several different scenarios that set up the situation, but the punch line was always the same: “It’s not just a good idea, it’s the LAW.”
After the Vietnam War was over, and the U.S. military stopped inducting draftees, the Selective Service System nevertheless remained in business, and the requirement that young men register for the draft when they turn 18 was never repealed. Apparently, however, there was a popular misimpression to the contrary, and the government bureaucrats in charge of such things were alarmed at the level of noncompliance. So they resorted to desperate measures, and retained the services of an advertising agency. The resulting campaign was run for several years—on television, on radio, and in print. There were several different scenarios that set up the situation, but the punch line was always the same: “It’s not just a good idea, it’s the LAW.”
It’s the law. Those
words can evoke different responses in different people. In some, they call
forth humble compliance, a submission to something larger than oneself, a
realization that the rule of law is the very basis of civilized society. In
others, the phrase stirs up a spirit of rebellious defiance, like a playground
bully exclaiming, “Oh yeah? Well make me!” But in either case, it does get our
attention. Whether we comply with the law or defy the law, our behavior is
nevertheless defined in terms of the law.
In today’s
liturgy, we are confronted with the ultimate expression of the concept of law:
the Ten Commandments. They have been around for four thousand years, and constitute
the bedrock of the Judeo-Christian moral tradition. Within the culture of
Anglican Christianity, the Decalogue is particularly conspicuous and ingrained.
When Archbishop Cranmer reworked the liturgy of the Eucharist for the 1552 Book
of Common Prayer, he put the Ten Commandments at the very beginning of the
service, and they have remained there—either prescribed or as an option—ever
since. In many parish churches both in England and in older parts of America, they
are engraved in stone or wood and displayed prominently on the east wall. One
might argue, of course, that the Ten Commandments are honored more in the
breach than in the observance—but either way, they are conspicuous.
The notion of
law seems obvious enough. Every human society and community has it in one form
or another. If we break the law, there is some adverse consequence, some kind
of punishment, either now or later. If we keep the law, there is some sort of
reward or other pleasant consequence (even if it’s just the avoidance of a negative
one).
But can it
really be all that simplistic? I suspect we do well to disabuse ourselves of
childish misconceptions about law in general, and God’s law in particular. One
of these misconceptions is that, by keeping God’s law faithfully, we can put
him in our debt. By walking the straight and narrow, we can obligate God to
bless us or favor us. By obeying God, we have earned our reward, and it is
morally incumbent upon Him to produce it, to hand it over, as if it had been
justly bought and paid for.
The fact is, however,
every arrow we shoot toward the target of trying to earn God’s favor by keeping
His law falls way short of the mark. The New Testament Greek word for “sin” is hamartia, and it literally means
“falling short of the mark.” St Paul tells us in the epistle to the Romans that
“all have sinned and come short of the glory of God.” Some of our arrows, to be
sure, get further on down toward the target than others, but they all fall
short. So no amount of law keeping can ethically obligate God to even give us
the time of day, let alone a heavenly reward.
Another
misconception thinks in terms not of results, but of effort. This is certainly
a more kindly view. It doesn’t matter that we hit the target, but only that we
try really hard, give it our
best effort, and get as close as we can. This inclines God to love us, or
perhaps only like us, or at least think we’re cute. We could do worse, I
suppose, than to be God’s affectionately smiled-at pets, mascots of the kingdom
of Heaven. But such a view woefully underestimates the nature and purpose of
human existence—we are created, after all, in the very image and likeness of
God, to be His friends, not his pets. But more than that, the “A for effort”
view of keeping the law betrays a paltry understanding of the purity of God’s
holiness. It isn’t that God is arbitrarily mean or cosmically uptight. But by
his very nature, in his essential being, God cannot indefinitely tolerate
imperfection. He is patient and long-suffering and abounding in mercy. He
accepts me, as the song says, “just as I am,” but he does not wish me to remain
in that condition! He wants me to be able to hit the target every time, and not
ever fall short. And he will not simply more the target in order to enable me
to do so. That would not be fair, either to God or to me.
Now, from a
negative perspective, there’s another misimpression of what it means to be
law-abiding. The experience of many is that the law is a cruel joke, by which
God amuses Himself by watching us fail. “Oops! There they go again, those silly
humans. Won’t they ever get it right?” Or, in a less cynical and more rational
mode, the law is not really “from God” at all, but, rather, a projection onto
God of the human need for security, for boundaries we can rely on. The
courageous thing to do is to admit that all laws are man-made, and while many
of them may indeed be good ideas, we are not ultimately accountable to any of
them. No law is immune from the possibility that circumstances may justify an exception. The Ten Commandments are,
in effect, ten “guidelines” which are good to check in with before making an
ethical decision.
Now, I hope I
don’t have to tell you that I believe all of these notions—that we can obligate
God by keeping the law, that we can increase the chances of God liking us if we
try really hard to keep the law, that
the law is a cruel joke for God’s entertainment, and the that law is merely a
human invention and projection—all of these notions are based on false
suppositions. But they arise from an understandable desire to integrate our
immediate experience with our search for ultimate meaning, to have our
conception of what is ideal for us determined by our prior experience of what
is real for us. And so there are fragments of truth and goodness in what is
otherwise a nasty pile of selfishness and moral relativism.
The 19th
Psalm, which is part of our prayer at this liturgy, expresses in beautiful
poetry what I am
trying to say through less than adequate prose. “The law of the Lord is perfect...and
revives the soul.” Far from being oppressive or authoritarian, far from been
lifeless and technical, the Psalmist sees God’s law as life-giving, refreshing
and reviving to the soul, like water flowing through a desert. He goes on to
say that the “testimony of the
Lord...gives wisdom”—it gives us practical aid in coping with the bewildering
complexities of human relationships. “The statutes”—what more legal-sounding
word is there than “statutes”?!—the “statutes of the Lord and just and rejoice
the heart.” There is something beautiful about justice, just as there is in an
elegantly crafted geometric pattern. Both are a joy to behold. And it is only
the law that allows us to see the beauty of justice, that allows our hearts to
rejoice thereby.
The Psalmist
continues, “The commandment of the Lord is clear...and gives light to the
eyes.” Eyes tell the story, don’t they? When someone’s heart and soul are whole
and integrated, you can tell it in his or her eyes, and vice versa. It is the
commandment of the Lord that reveals the integrity of the way we live, a
revelation that is visible in our eyes. According to
the Psalmist, then, there is intrinsic good that is made evident in the law. The
law refreshes and nourishes and strengthens. To be nourished and refreshed and
strengthened are the fruits of a life lived close to the heart of God. In fact,
“keeping the law” is a practical description of what it looks like when we
align ourselves with the flow of God’s loving energy.
It’s not that
the law is an end of itself. We don’t keep the law just for the sake of keeping
the law. In fact, our aim shouldn’t be “keeping the law” at all, it should be
singing in harmony with God, allowing our energy to flow in the same direction
in which his is flowing, letting our hearts assume the shape of God’s heart.
And how do we know how well we are accomplishing these aims? By means of the
law. The law is a measuring stick by which we
can tell how we’re doing in the process of offering ourselves to God for the
purpose of being blessed and broken and given for the life of the world. The
law of the Lord is perfect and just and clear. It revives the soul and gives
wisdom and joy and light.
Most of us
have used a computer program. Even if there’s not an appliance in our home that
we call a computer, if we drive a car that’s been built in the last twenty years,
or use a cell phone, or even a microwave, we are, in fact, using a computer.
Now, for everything that we use each of these “computers” for, some programmer
had to sit down and write what they call “lines of code”—hundreds and thousands
of individual commands that tell the computer how to do what we want it to do,
breaking down complex tasks into simple “Yes/No” bits of information. Of
course, when we use a computer, for instance, to support a graphics program
capable of creating beautiful works of visual art, most of us are not thinking
about lines of code. But the lines of code—prosaic and dull and technical as
they are—the lines of code are essential to the creation of the poetic and
artistic and transcendently beautiful output that eventually emerges from the
color printer. “Lines of code” describe, in effect, what it “looks like” to be
able to create graphic art.
It’s the same
relationship between God’s law and human moral behavior, human integrity. The
law describes what it looks like to be attuned to God’s love, God’s ways. We can’t keep
it perfectly. Much of the time, we can’t even keep it well. But by the grace of
Christ, we can, in time, be transformed into people who keep it naturally,
without even thinking about it, as part of our redeemed nature. Only then will
the law become obsolete. Until then, it’s a good idea to keep the law.
Amen.
Comments
Post a Comment